• 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于自我管理的智能手机应用程序是帮助管理下腰痛(LBP)患者的宝贵工具。本系统评价的目的是(a)总结有关智能手机应用程序对LBP自我管理的有效性的现有研究,以及(b)确定意大利可用的免费应用程序,这些应用程序为LBP自我管理提供策略,并提供定性评估使用移动应用程序评定量表(MARS)。根据Prisma清单,搜索了六个书目数据库,关键词是“腰背痛”,\'移动应用程序\',\'智能手机\',和“远程医疗”。总的来说,筛选了852条记录,16项纳入了系统审查。在包括的六个RCT中,四个人报告了疼痛的统计学显着下降,有利于应用程序组,两个RCT没有。仅在非RCT中,残疾评分才增加。在对移动商店进行的应用研究中,我们通过MARS确定并评估了25个应用程序。IOS应用程序的总分从1.93到3.92不等,Play商店应用程序的总分从1.73到4.25不等。研究结果表明,很少有应用程序达到令人满意的质量,内容,和LBP自我管理的功能标准。
    Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the available studies on the efficacy of smartphone apps for self-management of LBP and (b) identify free applications available in Italy that offer strategies for LBP self-management and provide a qualitative assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). According to the Prisma Checklist, six bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords \'low back pain\', \'mobile application\', \'smartphone\', and \'telemedicine\'. In total, 852 records were screened, and 16 were included in the systematic review. Of the six RCTs included, four reported a statistically significant decrease in pain in favor of the app group, and two RCTs did not. Only in a non-RCT was there an increase in the disability score. In the application research conducted on mobile stores, we identified and rated 25 applications through MARS. The overall scores ranged from 1.93 to 3.92 for the IOS app and 1.73 to 4.25 for the Play Store app. The findings suggest that few apps meet satisfying quality, content, and functionality criteria for LBP self-management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:物理治疗方法用于消除由宫颈源性头痛(CHA)引起的问题,与上颈部结构相关的继发性头痛。本研究旨在探讨颈椎松动术(CM)配合临床普拉提练习(CPE)对疼痛的影响,CGH中的肌肉僵硬和头颈部血流量。材料和方法:共有25例患者参加了这项随机对照研究,并随机分为CM组和CMCPE组。所有治疗方法每周应用3天,共6周。结果测量为头痛强度和频率,镇痛药的数量,肌肉僵硬度和椎动脉(VA)和颈内动脉(ICA)血流量。通过视觉模拟量表测量头痛强度,肌压计的肌肉僵硬度和多普勒超声的血流。治疗6周后重复评估。组内比较通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行,组间比较采用Mann-WhitneyU检验。结果:两组治疗后,头痛的强度和频率以及镇痛药的数量减少,枕下的肌肉僵硬,上斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌(SCM)减少,ICA和VA的血流量增加(p<0.05)。在SKM的头痛强度(p=0.025)和肌肉僵硬度(p=0.044)方面,两组之间存在显着差异,有利于CMCPE组。结论:非药物治疗方法在与上颈部相关的CHA中具有重要作用。这项研究表明,将CM与CPE组合添加到CHA患者的非药物治疗中是有益的。
    Background and Objectives: Physiotherapy approaches are used to eliminate the problems caused by cervicogenic headache (CHA), known as secondary headache associated with the structures of the upper cervical region. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cervical mobilization (CM) with clinical Pilates exercises (CPE) on pain, muscle stiffness and head-neck blood flow in CGH. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 patients participated in this randomized controlled study and were randomized into either the CM group or the CM+CPE group. All treatment methods were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The outcome measure was headache intensity and frequency, the number of analgesics, muscle stiffness and vertebral artery (VA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow. Headache intensity was measured by a visual analogue scale, muscle stiffness by a myotonometer and blood flow by Doppler US. Evaluations were repeated after 6 weeks of treatment. Within-group comparisons were made by the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and between-group comparisons were made by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: After treatments in the two groups, headache intensity and frequency and the number of analgesics decreased, the muscle stiffness of the suboccipital, upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles decreased, and the blood flow of the ICA and VA increased (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of headache intensity (p = 0.025) and muscle stiffness in SKM (p = 0.044) in favor of the CM+CPE group. Conclusions: Non-pharmacological treatment approaches have an important role in CHA related to the upper cervical region. This study suggests that it would be beneficial to add CM in combination with CPE to the non-pharmacological treatment of patients with CHA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)的关注涉及统计调查,显示WMSDs的发病率呈上升趋势。技术发展导致了评估工作中物理负荷的新工具和方法。这些方法大多基于对适当参数的直接感知,这允许更精确的量化。本文的目的是比较斯洛伐克的几种常用方法,以评估反映当前欧盟和斯洛伐克立法法规的人体工程学风险。Captiv无线传感系统用于汽车前照灯质量控制总成工作场所进行传感,数据采集和数据处理。在评估工作中的姿势和动作时,我们发现了适用标准的差异:第542/2007号法令Coll。(斯洛伐克立法),STNEN1005-4+A1以及Captiv系统中默认的法国标准。标准定义了危险姿势的阈值,在几个评估的身体部分有显著差异,这影响了测量的最终评估。我们应用改进的风险评估方法的经验可能会对斯洛伐克的工业工作场所产生影响。证实有必要为人体姿势的人体工程学风险评估建立统一标准,包括各个身体部分的阈值的详细描述。
    Attention on work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) involves statistical surveys showing an increasing trend in the incidence of WMSDs. Technological development has led to new tools and methods for the assessment of physical load at work. These methods are mostly based on the direct sensing of appropriate parameters, which allows more precise quantification. The aim of this paper is to compare several commonly used methods in Slovakia for the assessment of ergonomic risk reflecting current EU and Slovak legislative regulations. A Captiv wireless sensory system was used at a car headlight quality control assembly workplace for sensing, data acquisition and data processing. During the evaluation of postures and movements at work, we discovered differences in the applicable standards: Decree 542/2007 Coll. (Slovak Legislation), the STN EN 1005-4+A1, and the French standards default in the Captiv system. Standards define the thresholds for hazardous postures with significant differences in several evaluated body segments, which affects the final evaluation of the measurements. Our experience from applying improved risk assessment methodology may have an impact on Slovak industrial workplaces. It was confirmed that there is a need to create uniform standards for the ergonomic risk assessment of body posture, including a detailed description of the threshold values for individual body segments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐力运动包括从马拉松和铁人三项到超级马拉松的广泛活动,长途骑行,滑雪,和游泳。由于这些事件的受欢迎程度激增,我们更需要了解相关的医疗风险。本文回顾了耐力赛的历史,回顾心血管疾病最关键和最常见的原因,热,电解质,和肌肉骨骼损伤/疾病,并讨论与此类事件相关的医疗主任/人员的注意事项。
    Endurance sports encompass a broad range of events from marathons and triathlons to ultramarathons, long-distance cycling, skiing, and swimming. As these events have experienced a surge in popularity, we have a greater need to understand the associated medical risks. This article reviews the history of endurance races, reviews the most critical and common causes of cardiovascular, heat, electrolyte, and musculoskeletal injuries/illnesses, and discusses considerations for medical directors/personnel associated with such events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估对间充质基质细胞(MSCs)治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的介入试验登记和报告结果的法定要求的遵守情况,并描述试验的临床和设计特点。
    方法:对已发表的试验和提交给公共登记处的试验的系统评价。
    方法:数据库Medline,科克伦图书馆和麦克马斯特;六个公共临床登记处。所有搜索都进行到2023年1月31日。
    方法:提交给注册管理机构并在2021年1月之前完成的试验。发表在同行评审期刊上的前瞻性介入试验。
    方法:第一作者搜索了那些(1)在公共注册表中发布了试验结果的试验,(2)在同行评审的出版物中介绍了结果,以及(3)在发布前向注册表提交了审前协议。其他提取的变量包括试验设计,参与人数,资金来源,随访持续时间和细胞类型。
    结果:在登记处和文献数据库中发现了总共124项试验。膝关节骨性关节炎是最常见的适应症。在100项注册试验中,52项试验,共有2993名参与者既没有在注册登记中公布结果,也没有公布结果。52项注册试验回顾性地提交了协议。在已发表的67项试验中,有43项(64%)注册了审前方案。资金来源与遵守报告要求无关。在25项试验中的16项发现了注册和出版物中主要终点之间的差异。在28%的试验中,治疗组采用辅助治疗.只有39%的对照试验是双盲的。
    结论:很大一部分试验不符合注册和报告结果的法定要求,从而增加了结果评估中偏差的风险。为了提高对MSCs在肌肉骨骼疾病中的作用的信心,注册管理机构和医学期刊应更严格地执行现有的注册和报告要求。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal disorders and to describe the trials\' clinical and design characteristics.
    METHODS: A systematic review of published trials and trials submitted to public registries.
    METHODS: The databases Medline, Cochrane Library and McMaster; six public clinical registries. All searches were done until 31 January 2023.
    METHODS: Trials submitted to registries and completed before January 2021. Prospective interventional trials published in peer-reviewed journals.
    METHODS: The first author searched for trials that had (1) posted trial results in a public registry, (2) presented results in a peer-reviewed publication and (3) submitted a pretrial protocol to a registry before publication. Other extracted variables included trial design, number of participants, funding source, follow-up duration and cell type.
    RESULTS: In total 124 trials were found in registries and literature databases. Knee osteoarthritis was the most common indication. Of the 100 registry trials, 52 trials with in total 2 993 participants had neither posted results in the registry nor published results. Fifty-two of the registry trials submitted a protocol retrospectively. Forty-three of the 67 published trials (64%) had registered a pretrial protocol. Funding source was not associated with compliance with reporting requirements. A discrepancy between primary endpoints in the registry and publication was found in 16 of 25 trials. In 28% of trials, the treatment groups used adjuvant therapies. Only 39% of controlled trials were double-blinded.
    CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of trials failed to comply with statutory requirements for the registration and reporting of results, thereby increasing the risk of bias in outcome assessments. To improve confidence in the role of MSCs for musculoskeletal disorders, registries and medical journals should more rigorously enforce existing requirements for registration and reporting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WRMSD)在欧洲构成了重大的职业健康挑战。经济的数字化极大地重塑了工作的性质和组织。混合工作的扩散,其特点是基于办公室和远程工作的组合,COVID-19大流行加速了。这篇综述涵盖了混合工作形式,它们对WRMSD的影响,以及对WRMSD薪酬的潜在影响。大约30-40%的欧洲劳动力可能会过渡到混合工作形式。混合工作安排会导致行李箱的静态姿势延长,脖子,上肢没有足够的休息,从而增加颈部和下背部疼痛的风险。随着远程工作和混合工作变得越来越普遍,预计在工作人口中,非特定WRMSD将增加。在许多国家,WRMSD的索赔需要医疗保健专业人员的正式诊断。然而,非特异性WRMSD的案例,如颈痛或慢性肩痛,-通常在从事主要是低强度的久坐工人中观察到,在视觉和认知要求苛刻的任务中长时间的静态工作-通常不符合职业病的补偿标准。补偿系统和/或补偿标准必须适应远程办公的兴起,需要不断发展的补偿标准,以解决医疗和风险暴露方面的考虑。
    Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) pose a significant occupational health challenge in Europe. The digitization of the economy substantially reshaped the nature and organization of work. The proliferation of hybrid working, characterized by a combination of office-based and remote work, has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This review covers hybrid forms of work, their impact on WRMSDs, and the potential implications for WRMSD compensation. Approximately 30-40% of the European workforce could potentially transition to hybrid forms of work. Hybrid work arrangements can result in prolonged static postures of the trunk, neck, and upper limbs without adequate breaks, thereby increasing the risk of neck and lower back pain. As teleworking and hybrid working become more prevalent, an increase in non-specific WRMSDs is anticipated among the working population. In many countries, claims for WRMSDs necessitate a formal diagnosis by a healthcare professional. However, cases of non-specific WRMSDs, such as cervicalgia or chronic shoulder pain, - commonly observed in sedentary workers engaged in predominantly low-intensity, prolonged static work amid visually and cognitively demanding tasks - often do not meet the criteria for compensation as occupational diseases. The compensation system and/or the criteria for compensation must be adapted to accommodate the rise of telework, necessitating evolving criteria for compensation that address both medical and risk exposure considerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:军事人群的伤害流行病学研究通常利用通过医学图表审查(MCR)或伤害自我报告(ISR)获得的数据。MCR数据将不会捕获未寻求医疗护理的肌肉骨骼损伤(MSKI)数据,这在征兵训练中很常见。伤害自我报告受到召回问题的影响,特别是对于被认为不太严重的MSKIs。美国海军陆战队(USMC)的新兵参加了为期13周的紧张的新兵培训计划,在此期间他们容易受到MSKI的影响。当前分析的目的是利用一种新的统计方法,捕获-再捕获(CRC)技术,考虑MSKI数据源固有的低估,并估计USMC招募培训期间MSKI的确定校正累积发生率。
    方法:当前研究的数据来自一项更大的研究,USMC性别融合招聘培训研究,该项目旨在提供数据驱动的建议,以增加USMC招募培训中的性别融合。根据2个来源的MSKI数据(MCR,ISR)并使用CRC分析。对医学图表进行了审查,以提取有关招募培训期间发生的MSKI的数据。同一时期的自我报告MSKI数据是在新兵培训结束时从新兵那里获得的。MSKIs根据其解剖位置和类型进行分类。林肯-彼得森估计器的查普曼修改被用来进行CRC分析。
    结果:可获得464名USMC新兵(年龄:19.1±1.9岁;性别:男性70.0%)的医学图表审查和ISRMSKI数据。在样本中观察到的MSKI的13周累积发生率在MCR中为21.8%,在ISR中为28.4%,而CRC的发病率要高得多(62.0%)。MCR和ISR分别为35.1%和45.9%,分别,而当使用2个来源时,MSKI数据的总体确定或完整性是中等的(65.0%)。当按MSKI解剖位置分层时,总体确定因MSKI的解剖位置而异。下肢MSKIs最高(64.8%),但较低为上肢(38.9%)和脊柱(33.3%)MSKIs。总体确定也因MSKI类型而异;扭伤最高(55.1%),其次是菌株(54.8%),和疼痛/痉挛/疼痛(43.3%)。
    结论:这是第一项利用CRC技术获取USMC新兵中MSKIs的确定校正发生率的研究。分析的两个数据来源都存在严重的低估,减量的程度因MSKI的解剖位置和类型而异。当两个数据源同时使用时,从2个数据来源观察到的CRC估计MSKIs的百分比更完整.需要进一步将CRC技术应用于军事人群中的MSKI数据,以提供对MSKI的更完整的评估。还需要确定影响军事新兵训练期间获得的MSKI数据完整性的可修改因素。
    BACKGROUND: Injury epidemiology research with military populations typically utilizes data obtained through medical chart review (MCR) or injury self-reports (ISRs). MCR data will not capture musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) data for which medical care was not sought, which is common during military recruit training. Injury self-report is affected by issues with recall, especially for MSKIs perceived as less severe. U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) recruits participate in an intense 13-week recruit training program during which they are susceptible to MSKIs. The purpose of the current analysis was to utilize a novel statistical method, the capture-recapture (CRC) technique, to account for the undercounting inherent in MSKI data sources and estimate the ascertainment-corrected cumulative incidence of MSKIs during USMC recruit training.
    METHODS: Data for the current study were derived from a larger study, the USMC Gender-Integrated Recruit Training Study, which was initiated to provide data-driven recommendations to increase gender integration in USMC recruit training. The estimated cumulative incidence of MSKIs during 13-weeks of USMC recruit training was calculated from the 2 sources of MSKI data (MCR, ISR) and using CRC analysis. Medical charts were reviewed to extract data about MSKIs that occurred during recruit training. Self-reported MSKI data for the same period were obtained from recruits at the end of recruit training. MSKIs were classified according to their anatomical location and type. The Chapman modification of the Lincoln-Peterson estimator was utilized to conduct the CRC analysis.
    RESULTS: Medical chart review and ISR MSKI data were available for 464 USMC recruits (age: 19.1 ± 1.9 years; gender: men 70.0%). The observed 13-week cumulative incidence of MSKI in the sample was 21.8% in the MCR and 28.4% in the ISR, while the CRC incidence was much higher (62.0%). The MCR and ISR ascertainment were 35.1% and 45.9%, respectively, while the overall ascertainment or completeness of MSKI data when 2 sources were used was moderate (65.0%). When stratified by MSKI anatomical location, the overall ascertainment varied by anatomical location of the MSKI. It was highest for lower extremity MSKIs (64.8%), but lower for upper extremity (38.9%) and spine (33.3%) MSKIs. The overall ascertainment also varied by MSKI type; it was highest for sprain (55.1%), followed by strain (54.8%), and the pain/spasm/ache (43.3%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to utilize the CRC technique to access the ascertainment-corrected incidence of MSKIs among USMC recruits. There was significant undercounting in both sources of the data analyzed, and the extent of undercounting varied by both MSKI anatomical location and type. When 2 sources of data were utilized simultaneously, the percent of CRC-estimated MSKIs observed from 2 sources of data was more complete. There is a need for further application of the CRC technique to MSKI data in military populations to provide a more complete assessment of MSKIs. Identification of modifiable factors that influence completeness of MSKI data obtained during military recruit training is also warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)影响全球人群,导致职业病,降低生产力。运动疗法是MSD的黄金标准治疗,可以由物理治疗师和/或通过移动应用程序提供。除了物理治疗师和移动应用程序之间在沟通方面的明显差异,同理心和身体接触,移动应用程序可能提供较少的个性化练习。人工智能(AI)的使用可以通过处理不同的疼痛参数来克服这个问题,合并症和患者特定的生活方式因素,从而使个人适应运动疗法。这项研究的目的是调查AI推荐强度的风险,为拥有MSD的人进行的移动性和释放练习,使用物理治疗师风险评估和回顾性考虑患者对风险和非风险运动的反馈。80名患有各种MSD的患者接受了AI系统的运动建议。物理治疗师将锻炼分为有风险或无风险,根据患者信息,例如疼痛强度(NRS),疼痛质量,疼痛位置,工作类型。对物理治疗师协议的分析是基于上述风险的频率,百分比分布和弗莱斯-或科恩斯-卡帕。练习完成后,患者以11点Likert量表为每次锻炼提供反馈.,例如,释放练习的反馈问题是“你感觉如何?”,答案选项从“痛苦(0分)”到“不明显(10分)”。分别对三种类型的练习进行统计分析。为此,进行独立t检验.20名物理治疗师评估了80例患者,共接受944次练习。在物理治疗师的三方协议中,0.08%的锻炼被认为具有增加患者疼痛的潜在风险。评估显示90.5%的一致性,演习没有风险。物理治疗师认为对患者有潜在风险的锻炼也收到了较低的患者反馈评分。对于\'release\'练习类型,风险练习收到的反馈较低,表明患者感到更多疼痛(风险:4.65(1.88),无风险:5.56(1.88))。研究表明,AI可以为MSD患者推荐几乎无风险的运动,这是创建个性化运动计划的有效方法,而不会使患者面临更高的疼痛强度或不适的风险。此外,该研究表明,物理治疗师在AI推荐锻炼的风险评估方面达成了显著一致,并强调了在治疗计划中考虑个体患者观点的重要性.面对面理疗的其他方面的程度,比如沟通和教育,与AI和基于应用程序的练习相比,应进一步研究除了练习的个性化之外的其他好处。试用注册:30.12.2021通过OSF注册局,https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YCNJQ。
    Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) impact people globally, cause occupational illness and reduce productivity. Exercise therapy is the gold standard treatment for MSDs and can be provided by physiotherapists and/or also via mobile apps. Apart from the obvious differences between physiotherapists and mobile apps regarding communication, empathy and physical touch, mobile apps potentially offer less personalized exercises. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) may overcome this issue by processing different pain parameters, comorbidities and patient-specific lifestyle factors and thereby enabling individually adapted exercise therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the risks of AI-recommended strength, mobility and release exercises for people with MSDs, using physiotherapist risk assessment and retrospective consideration of patient feedback on risk and non-risk exercises. 80 patients with various MSDs received exercise recommendations from the AI-system. Physiotherapists rated exercises as risk or non-risk, based on patient information, e.g. pain intensity (NRS), pain quality, pain location, work type. The analysis of physiotherapists\' agreement was based on the frequencies of mentioned risk, the percentage distribution and the Fleiss- or Cohens-Kappa. After completion of the exercises, the patients provided feedback for each exercise on an 11-point Likert scale., e.g. the feedback question for release exercises was \"How did the stretch feel to you?\" with the answer options ranging from \"painful (0 points)\" to \"not noticeable (10 points)\". The statistical analysis was carried out separately for the three types of exercises. For this, an independent t-test was performed. 20 physiotherapists assessed 80 patient examples, receiving a total of 944 exercises. In a three-way agreement of the physiotherapists, 0.08% of the exercises were judged as having a potential risk of increasing patients\' pain. The evaluation showed 90.5% agreement, that exercises had no risk. Exercises that were considered by physiotherapists to be potentially risky for patients also received lower feedback ratings from patients. For the \'release\' exercise type, risk exercises received lower feedback, indicating that the patient felt more pain (risk: 4.65 (1.88), non-risk: 5.56 (1.88)). The study shows that AI can recommend almost risk-free exercises for patients with MSDs, which is an effective way to create individualized exercise plans without putting patients at risk for higher pain intensity or discomfort. In addition, the study shows significant agreement between physiotherapists in the risk assessment of AI-recommended exercises and highlights the importance of considering individual patient perspectives for treatment planning. The extent to which other aspects of face-to-face physiotherapy, such as communication and education, provide additional benefits beyond the individualization of exercises compared to AI and app-based exercises should be further investigated.Trial registration: 30.12.2021 via OSF Registries, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YCNJQ .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    如果您在年轻患者中遇到无法解释的骨髓水肿病例,考虑骨样骨瘤(OO)的可能性。即使在重要结构附近有一个nidus,RFA可以安全地用于治疗OO。
    If you encounter an unexplained case of bone marrow edema in a young patient, consider the possibility of osteoid osteoma (OO). Even in the presence of a nidus near vital structures, RFA can safely be used to treat OO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号